The chilling murder of Ambreen, who was strangled and set on fire in Galyat’s Makol village, was linked to a 15-member jirga that had allegedly ruled on April 28, 2016, that she should be killed for helping her friend Saima escape the village on April 23 to marry of her own free will. The jirga had also allegedly ordered the torching of the vehicle in which the two girls had tried to escape.
When the jirga, after a six-hour meeting, ended, Ambreen was taken from her home to an abandoned house where she was allegedly drugged, killed and placed in the backseat of a parked van. The van was then doused with petrol and set on fire. The charred body of the teenage girl was found on May 2, 2016, in the torched Suzuki van in Donga Gali.
The Abbottabad District Police Officer Khurram Rasheed had said at the time that since the girl’s family was poor, her mother was unable to resist the jirga’s decision because most of its members were criminals and not elders of the area.
Police had recovered drugs from an abandoned house near the site, as well as a can of petrol used to start the fire. Another vehicle parked near the gutted van was also damaged. However, the evidence against the suspects was believed to not be ‘adequate’ as police officials had arrested the accused individuals by going through their cellphone records.
Mohammad Naseer, the driver and owner of the vehicle, had lodged an FIR under Sections 302/436 and 427 with the Donga Gali police on April 29 against the torching of his vehicle. Subsequently, the police arrested 14 people identified as Siraj Ali, Shabbir Ahmed, Javed Akhter, Gul Zareen, Afzal Muneer, Mohammad Naseer (driver), Pervez (head of the jirga), Umer Zaib, Saeed, Gul Zaman son of Abdul Sattar, Gul Zaman son of Lal Akbar, Safdar, Pervez, and Shamim (Ambreen’s mother).
Saima, the girl who had allegedly eloped with Ambreen’s help, stated that the deceased knew nothing about her marriage. “She knew nothing about my marriage and she was not my friend,” Saima had told media at the time.
She had also asked the authorities for security, saying she and her husband were in danger. “Those who burnt her are now threatening me, and we ask the authorities to provide us security,” she had said.
A senior lawyer had told media on condition of anonymity in May 2016 that the police investigation into the case was faulty as the suspects held in connection with the case were the people who had decreed against the girl who had run away with her paramour and had nothing to do with the murder of the girl.
According to the lawyer, police had based their investigation on the phone calls made by the councillor Pervez to call up the people to participate in the jirga.